Showing posts with label Romantic Comedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romantic Comedy. Show all posts

Friday, January 27, 2023

Movie Review: Maybe I Do

 



Michael's Movie Grade: D-

A bland and surprisingly unpleasant romantic comedy. 

This film is an adaptation of a play written by Michael Jacobs, who wrote and directed this movie. When you consider this film's stage play origins some of its faults make a lot of sense. There are many things here that might work in a stage play but fall flat in a movie. For instance, much of the movie's dialogue is taken up by speeches from various characters about marriage, love and loneliness. Every main character has multiple speeches and while this may work in a play, it seems awkward, forced and tiresome in a movie. There is also the fact that this movie tells us everything and shows us nothing. When it comes to the characters' backstories, which play a huge role in this film, we only hear about them through long passages of dialogue rather than flashbacks or any other cinematic device that could convey it much better. Yet these are not the only problems this film has. The worst fault of this film is the characters themselves. It is hard to ever care about them because they never feel real to us. The characters only have the slimiest bits of personality and nothing else. Despite the fact that these characters are supposed to be our emotional attachment to the film, they feel more like plot devices than characters and this is not helped by the way that they talk like critics trying to dissect what a film means than how anyone would actually talk in such a situation. Also for a romantic comedy this movie is actually kind of unpleasant. The majority of the film is spent with characters arguing and saying mean things about each other. Because of this, when the film tries to be that feel good romantic comedy, it often feels like too little too late. This may have worked if this film worked as an insight to what makes marriages go wrong but once you get down to it, it has little to actually say (despite how much characters talk about it) that we haven't heard a million times. There are also enough scenes that flat out deny that such a pessimistic outlook on marriage would be its intention. The result is a movie that is neither deep enough to work as a social commentary nor romantic enough to work as a romantic comedy.

This movie does have a wonderful cast, of great A-list stars including Emma Roberts, William H. Macy, Susan Sarandon, Richard Gere, Diane Keaton and Luke Bracey and all of them give good performances that can occasionally (though nowhere near often enough) give some life to the material. There are also a couple of good jokes here. However these simply aren't enough to make up for the rest of the movie. 

This story may have worked as a stage play (I haven't seen the play, so I can't say for sure), but it simply does not work as a movie.


Saturday, November 26, 2022

Michael's Christmas Movie Guide: The Bishop's Wife (1947)

 


One of the best Christmas movies ever made. 

This film has a storyline that is simply hard to resist. Around Christmas time a bishop (David Niven) is spending all his time focusing on building a new church. The stress and overwork are making him increasingly unhappy and distant from his beautiful wife (Loretta Young). In a time of desperation, he says a prayer for guidance and an angel (Cary Grant) appears to help him. However, when the angel makes his wife the happiest, she has been in a while, he starts to suspect the angel is trying to steal her away from him.

This film did not come about easily. The original director was William A. Seiter, who my fellow Laurel and Hardy fans might know as the director of the classic Sons of the Desert (1933). However Samuel Goldwyn did not like how the film was progressing and replaced him with Harry Koster as the director. The angel was originally going to be played by David Niven, and the Bishop by Dana Andrews, and Tersea Wright as the wife. However Tersea Wright had to leave due to pregnancy. The wife was to be played now by Loretta Young. However she was under contract to RKO. Dana Andrews was traded to RKO in order for MGM to get Young. The Bishop part was given to Cary Grant. However it was discovered that Grant would work better as the angel, so Niven and Grant traded roles. On top of all this the preview did not go well. Goldwyn was unhappy with Leonardo Bercovici and Robert E. Sherwood's script, so Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett were hired to refine the script, both without receiving credit. The film did well with critics, but less so with an audience. Because of this the title was temporary changed to Cary and the Bishop's Wife. Adding Cary Grant's first name to the title somehow did increase the box office results somewhat.

Even with all those issues to overcome, this turned out to be a near perfect movie. Everything in this film works near perfectly. The fantasy element is wonderful and this whole movie comes off as a wonderful Christmas themed fairy tale. The film only gets more magical as the more times you watch it. The romance is simply wonderful. This may be one of the most touching romances in movie history. The chemistry between all three leads is fantastic and there is never a single scene about the romance where it is not 100% believable. The humor is delightful. While the film may not always be laugh out loud funny, it does always keep a smile firmly on your face. There are also a few really good laugh out loud moments. What really makes the movie work though is the little moments that are simply charming. There is such a sweet an irresistible charm to scenes like the ice-skating scene and the choir scene, that gives one that heartwarming Christmas feeling. 

This is a film that always gives me a great feeling of joy every time I watch it. 



Thursday, November 17, 2022

Movie Review: Ticket to Paradise

 



Michael's Movie Grade: C

An okay romantic comedy. 

If there is a movie that fully gets by on the talents and charisma of its stars, it is this one. The story is a very typical romantic comedy and if you have ever watched the Hallmark channel then you know everything that was going to happen. What gives this movie charm in spite of its familiarity is the likability of the stars and of the characters they play. The main characters in this film are played by George Clooney, Julia Roberts and Kaitlyn Dever (Booksmart, TV's Last Man Standing). These three are simply overflowing with charm and enhance any film they are in. In this movie, they are at their most likable and charming and make some of the corniest most predictable moments quite a bit of fun. I also like that this film makes their characters always very likable even when they are being selfish or being angry at each other. This makes the film feel a bit like a pleasant vacation with nice people. The movie also takes good advantage of its island setting and this makes for a very visually pleasing film. While the humor never made me laugh out loud, quite a few of the jokes made me smile a little bit and there weren't many really bad jokes here. 

The problem with this film is that is extremely similar to a great number of romantic comedies and does nothing to make it stand out from the pack. As such this is one of those films that you might forget about rather quickly after watching it. Also with the movie's predictability, many of the plot points feel too painfully obvious and there are too many times when we are simply waiting for what we know is bound to happen to happen.

This film provides a pleasant trip to the movies but little more.    

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

Movie Review: Ask Me to Dance

 



Michael's Movie Grade: F

A horrible excuse for a romcom. 

This is a perfect example of a tired and cliché romcom simply going through the motions. Not only does the film follow so many clichés that are common to these types of movies, but it handles them in such a bland and boring way that it is hard to care about a thing that happens. The characters all have very little personality outside of a few traits that are needed to move the story forward. There is never one moment where any of them feel real and this makes it hard to care about them at all. The humor is simply horrible here. This tries to be a bit wackier than your average romcom, but unfortunately there is hardly a laugh to be found among the many supposedly comedic moments. Most of them try way to hard and simply come off as annoying. There were many jokes here that made me simply want to walk out of the theater. Yet these terrible comedy moments just kept coming and each was less funny than the last. 

This movie tries to follow the Sleepless in Seatle formula of having the couple not meet for most of the film. Unfortunately this does not work here the way it did in that movie. The ways they keep barely missing each other feels very forced and stupid, often making the movie stretch one's suspension of disbelief too far.  

Just avoid this movie. 

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Movie Review: Unfavorable Odds

 



Michael's Movie Grade: F

Easily the worst romantic comedy I've ever seen and quite possibly one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

The problems with this movie even reach into the basics of filmmaking. This movie even messes on up on the basic parts of filmmaking we take for granted when watching a film. The camera sometimes moves for no reason whatsoever and it simply keeps moving. This is not an action film, but a romantic comedy and there is no reason for so much movement. To make matters worse sometimes the film will even cut to an exterior shot in the middle of a conversation as if we were supposed to watch two characters talking and all the sudden wonder what the outside of the building, they are in looks like. The worst offender in this case is the soundtrack. Throughout the entire film the sound cuts out at the beginning of every scene. The music and sound effects will suddenly stop and the everything will be silent and then when a character starts talking all the sound the music and sound effects will too. This is beyond distracting and takes you out of the movie at the start of every scene. Mentioning the music, it is terrible in that it never actually matches the action on screen. It is also often too loud and drowns out the dialogue. The sound effects are often too loud as well in a way that takes you out of the movie. 

This is not to say that better filmmaking could have made this film any good. The storyline feels like a clichéd sitcom plot stretched to feature length. This slim story is not even enough to pad out this 80minute movie (really short for a modern feature film). Because of this the film simply drags on for most of the runtime. The characters are pure cardboard cut outs and are little more than male and female stereotypes. Since the characters never feel real to us there is never a minute where anything that happens with them matters. This is also a romantic comedy, so there has to be some comedy. I wish that there didn't have to be any comedy. I never laughed once through the whole film. In fact, no one in the movie theater laughed once either. The comedy feels so forced and simply tries too hard. Much of the dialogue is also truly awful and sounds nothing like how people actually talk. 

This film is not only bad, but it makes me feel like I was too harsh on many other movies I truly hated, because at least they weren't as horribly made as this.  

Monday, August 1, 2022

Silent Film of the Month: Blonde for a Night (1928)

 



Runtime: 60 Minutes. Studio: DeMille Pictures Corporation. Directors: E. Mason Hopper, F. McGrew Willis. Story: Wilson Collison. Writers: Rex Taylor, F. McGrew Willis. Titles: John W. Krafft, Betty Browne (Comedy Titles) Main Cast: Harrison Ford, Marie Prevost, Franklin Pangborn, Lucien Littlefield, T. Roy Barnes. Cinematographer: Dewey Wrigley. Editor: James Morley.

As much as I love Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd, their popularity with modern classic movie fans causes many to think of their type of slapstick comedy as the only type of film comedy to come out of the silent era. However a wide variety of comedy movies came out of the silent era including many romantic comedies. A delightful example of a romantic comedy of this era was Blonde For a Night.  

The story would have felt right at home in a 1930's or 40's screwball comedy. After an argument with her husband (Harrison Ford) and upon learning that he used to have quite a fondness for blondes, a young woman (Marie Prevost) decides to disguise herself as a blonde to test his fidelity. 

This is an extremely charming little movie that is simply delightful from start to finish. Being only an hour long, the film moves at a fast pace and is never dull for a single second. Yet this short length (for a feature film) never hinders the movie by making it feel rushed. Instead the film feels just as long as it needs to or should be. The romance is very well handled and though there is a lot of comedy, there is also an underlying sweetness throughout. Despite being about fidelity this picture has a lighthearted touch to it, without ever making the storyline a joke or too trivial. When I first watched this film, I excepted it to be a sweet and charming movie, but what I did not except is to laugh as much as I did. This is a really funny film and has plenty of really good laughs. Betty Browne is credited with "comedy titles" and some of the intertitles are quite good. Some of the intertitles are funny little ways to introduce the characters. These types of intertitles were used often in silent comedy, and I personally have a real love of them. An example from this film, "George Mason, a dress buyer, who looked over the new models - and took the snappy ones out to dinner." However there are some great dialogue intertitles as well such as "If that memory expert gets through discussing stocks and blondes, tell him his future widow has gone out." This film shows us the great lost art of intertitles. Yet all the best silent films it doesn't depend entirely on intertitles but tells much of its story visually. If you take the intertitles out, the story would still make sense. The intertitles do what they are supposed to do by enhancing the story but not telling it.  

This movie benefits from a truly great cast. Marie Prevost by this time already had earned a place in film comedy. Beginning in 1917 she had worked with the legendary comedy producer Mack Sennett and appeared in many shorts and even a few features at the Sennett Studio. During this time she had been one of the infamous Mack Sennett Bathing Beauties. She quickly grew to movie stardom and made films for Mack Sennett, while also starring in feature films for Universal. Harrison Ford (not to be confused with the Star Wars and Indiana Jones actor of the same name) was quite a popular star in his day and starred in quite a few really good movies and was a prominent actor on the stage. This was not the only movie to feature both Marie Prevost and Harrison Ford, they also appeared together in Up in Mabel's Room (1926) and The Girl in the Pullman (1927). Two of the supporting actors will be very familiar to anyone who is a fan of classic slapstick comedy. Franklin Pangborn worked with quite a few of the great movie comedians. Comedy fans will probably recognize him best for appearing with W.C. Feilds in The Bank Dick (1940), Never Give a Sucker an Even Break (1941) and International House (1933), his roles in the Preston Sturges movies Christmas in July (1940), Sullivan's Travels (1941), The Palm Beach Story (1942) and Hail the Conquering Hero (1944), as well as being the photographer who tries to take a picture of Spanky in the Our gang short, Wild Poses (1933). Lucien Littlefield was a common face in both slapstick comedies and B-westerns. Comedy fans might know him best for his roles in Laurel and Hardy's Sons of the Desert (1933) and W.C. Fields' Man on the Flying Trapeze (1935). Fans of Roy Rogers movies might also recognize him. This movie marked the only directorial credit for F. McGrew Willis, who was much more prolific as a writer. He had written the previous Marie Prevost and Harrison Ford collaborations, Up in Mabel's Room (1926) and The Girl in the Pullman (1927). His writing career began in the 1910's and would last into the early 1940's with Sis Hopkins (1941) with Judy Canova as the title character. 


Motion Picture News, 1927

For anyone interested in seeing this film, it is on YouTube. 




Resources Used

A-Z of Silent Film Comedy by Glen Mitchell.

https://www.imdb.com/?ref_=nv_home

https://mediahistoryproject.org/



 

Monday, July 4, 2022

Movie Review: Mr. Malcom's List

 



Michael's Movie Grade: B-

A charming romance film. 

No better word can describe what works about this film than charming. We have seen these types of period romances many times and there is a reason for that. That is even with how familiar they get, there is still a certain comforting feeling about them and this is certainly present here. It has just what anyone who is a fan of these movies wants to see. The characters are likable and easy to relate to. They have their faults and don't always have the best intentions, but underneath this you can truly tell that they have good hearts. There is not a real villainous character in this movie and there doesn't need to be. There are just good people who sometimes do the wrong thing. And for this type of non-cynical escapism, sometimes that is what works best. Adding to this is the wonderfully charming performances from the cast. Everyone here plays their character with such an easygoing and delightful charm but in a way that still makes their characters feel real to us. There is simply such a likability to these performances that it is hard not to respond by liking the characters themselves. Even the moments where we just see one of them smile adds more charm to the film. This is also a period piece, and the movie takes full advantage of that. The sets and the costumes are lovely and make the film a delight to look at. There is also a fair share of humor here. Like many romantic comedies, it is rarely laugh out loud funny, but it does often put a smile on your face.

On the downside this is one of those films in which you can always guess what is going to happen next. As soon as the storyline is set up, you pretty much know beat for beat what is going to happen. However, there is definitely enough charm to make up for this.

This film may be very familiar stuff, but it is also charming enough to make it a nice trip to the movies.


Wednesday, March 23, 2022

Movie Review: Compartment No. 6 (Hytti nro 6)

 



Michael's Movie Grade: A-

A top-notch romance film. 

This movie's storyline is one that is nothing groundbreaking for a romance movie. The basic premise is that a woman is making a long train journey alone, where she has to share her compartment with a man who she at first dislikes. However, as the film goes on they develop a close friendship. While we may have seen similar stories quite often, what this movie does with this premise is truly great. One of the main ways this is done is the journey itself. You feel like you are actually going on a journey with these characters. The film gives a great sense of atmosphere to each place we visit. Not only do each of these places look beautiful, but there is a certain personality to each place that makes them as much of characters as our protagonists. Meanwhile we are filled with great little side trips that are truly charming. This movie's true beauty lies in the smaller moments. After the film is over these are the parts that will stay with us. Scenes like our heroine being at a party where she so obviously doesn't belong, our two main characters meeting an old lady friend of the guy's or a Finnish man briefly staying in our main characters' compartment are so irresistibly charming and have a strange unexplainable beauty to them. Little moments like these of course add to the feeling that we are going on a journey with these characters. The relationship between our two main characters is fantastic. This is not one of those pictures where it seems like the two characters who hate each other, simply end up liking each other because the plot says so. Instead, the change in their relationship feels perfectly natural and believable. Also whether they are hating each other or developing a beautiful friendship, these two are a joy to watch share the screen. The chemistry between these characters and the actors who play them (Yuriy Borisov,   Seidi Haarla) have excellent chemistry. This film also benefits from an excellent sense of humor and the last joke absolutely cracked me up.

A must see. 





Friday, February 18, 2022

Movie Review: The Worst Person in the World (Verdens verste menneske)

 


Michael's Movie Grade: A+

An absolute masterpiece. 

Though this movie is advertised as a romance, there is actually a lot more to the film than that. As well as a romance this film is a wonderful character study and a very intelligent commentary on our culture today. Even though this film is from Norway this commentary will speak to anyone, whatever country they live in. That is because these themes are universal and, in some ways, timeless but still completely of today. As a woman in her late 20's and early 30's (she starts the movie as 29 and ends it as 30), our main character feels like she should have her life in order or at least heading in some sort of direction. But as someone without a clear mapped out plan for her life or any huge accomplishments, she feels like she is a failure and that she is not as much of an adult as she wants to be. This is something clear and relatable to nearly everyone watching this film. We live in a society that for better or worse clearly states that you always have to be working towards some goal and that by a certain age, you should have already figured that out. Just think of how many times you have been asked a question resembling, "what do you want to be when you grow up?" (only the wording changes when you do grow up). Yet the truth is most of us don't always have a clear path and feel inferior because of it. At one point a character says to our main character that he wants her to see just how wonderful she is, and we want the exact same thing for her. Despite this movie focusing on her romantic relationships, the person she truly struggles to love is herself and that is where much of the best drama stems from. This is not to say these romantic scenes don't shine though. The movie mostly focuses on two of her romantic relationships and these are both excellently handled. Not only do she have a charming chemistry with both of these men, but there is depth behind these relationships, that make them far from the one-note type of romances we are used to seeing in countless romantic comedies. There are multiple little subtle facets behind these relationships just as there are in any relationship between two people. This can lead to some very effective tearjerker moments. In fact this may be the most I teared up in a movie theater in quite a while.

Now all that I have written so far may make this film sound pretentious and overly serious, but neither could be further from the truth. Even with all this going on the movie is in many ways a comedy and it is a really funny one. The comedy can range from sophisticated to childish or from insightful to slapstick. Regardless of the type of comedy used, it is all very funny. I laughed out loud watching this many more times than I thought I would and I could definitely hear those in the theater with me laughing too. Yet (with the possible exception of a scene involving drug hallucinations) all of this comedy moved the story forward beautifully. 

This is a must see. 



Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Michael's Christmas Movie Guide: Bachelor Mother (1939)


 Since romantic comedies today have such an understandably bad reputation, it is easy to forget that in the 1930's and 40's extremely entertaining romantic comedies often flowed out of Hollywood on a seeming regular basis. These films were full of a seeming effortless type of charm that populated so many movies of that era. Bachelor Mother was one of those movies.


Earlier in the year this film came out Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers made a movie together called The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle. After completion of that movie, it was decided that the popular duo would go separate ways career wise and each would make movies without the other. This is Ginger Rodgers' first film after that. After reading the screenplay Rogers worried that her character would not be considered likable. However, producer, Pandro Berman told her this would not happen and she agreed to do the film. However, she still remained worried about this. Her costar would be David Niven, who at this time was not the star he would later become, and in fact this was only his fourth film role. The director for the film would be Garson Kanin, who though the next year would direct My Favorite Wife is better remembered as a writer (he would later write The More the Merrier (1943), A Double Life (1947) and Adam's Rib (1949)). Kanin's career was also get started around this time.


The story begins one Christmas season when Polly (Ginger Rogers) gets fired from her job in a department store. She finds a small baby boy (Elbert Coplen Jr.) in the street and brings it into the orphanage. The people working at the orphanage think that Polly is his mother. They convince her boss David (David Niven) to give her the job back so she can take care of the baby. David does that and gives Polly the baby as a Christmas gift. David goes often to help her with the baby and ends up falling in love with Polly.


This movie was based off a story by Felix Jackson. That story had been filmed once before in Germany as a 1935 movie called Kleine Mutti (which translates to Little Mother). The story would be made into another movie later in 1956 called Bundle of Joy.


This is a movie of irrespirable charm. The charisma between Ginger Rogers and David Niven is fantastic and you believe ever second of film they spend together. The jokes are really funny, and consist of that classic fast paced clever dialogue that populated so many Hollywood movies of this era. More than anything though this movie just has great energy and is a lot of fun. For all classic movie fans this is a must watch. I am definitely not the only person to love this film. It was a huge box office hit and critics loved it as well.


A Donald Duck toy ends up playing a surprisingly big role in this movie. This is because at this time RKO (the studio which this film was made for) was currently distributing all of Walt Disney's film output including the Donald Duck shorts, making this a bit of self-promotion. There is a great gag at the end of the end credits where Donald Duck is credited as playing himself.


For more Michael's Christmas Movie Guide click here.

Resources Used
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/1088/Bachelor-Mother/articles.html
 

Saturday, May 15, 2021

Movie Review: Finding You

 



Michael's Movie Grade: C+

A charming and fun romantic comedy, if one that is extremely familiar.

Finding You is like a Hallmark movie but on the big screen (and characters drink tea instead of Folders coffee). Like a Hallmark movie it is nothing that I would proclaim as a great movie or one that will leave a big impact on me, but it is one that I truly enjoy watching. The storyline is basic and follows all the conventions of this type of movie. There is a misunderstanding, a romance between two characters that at first don't like each other, characters are looking to find more meaning in their lives and do and a lesson about truly living life. In many ways these are checkboxes that the movie fills out and leave everyone in the audience knowing what will happen next. However clichés are clichés for a reason and that is because they work and they work here. While I did feel some clichés were too drawn out and left me waiting for the obvious next step in that storyline (plus the movie had too many "endings"). Yet I still found myself really enjoying watching the film. The two romantic leads are very likable and the chemistry between  Jedidiah Goodacre and Rose Reid is fantastic. The best emotional scenes take place between our young couple and an old lady (Vanessa Redgrave) who has become an outcast in a small town where rumors travel fast. These scenes are surprisingly touching and were my favorite part of the movie. Another supporting character who stole the show whenever on screen was an Irish fiddle player (Patrick Bergin), whose scenes were quite charming. The humor in this movie is also surprisingly good and while I didn't laugh through the whole film, I definitely laughed more than a thought I would. The main character's self-proclaimed "little Sister" (Saoirse-Monica Jackson) provides the film with its funniest scenes and is just another supporting character who steals the show. Unfortunately the male lead's father (Tom Everett Scott) and co-star (Katherine McNamara) are simply clichés of movie characters and feel like nothing more than obstacles for our lovers. 

All in all this is a charming and fun romantic comedy, but it is also nothing you haven't seen a million times before. 

  

Thursday, February 18, 2021

Movie Review: Squared Love (Miłość do kwadratu)

 



Note: This film can currently be viewed on Netflix.


Michael's Movie Grade: F

A bland and incredibly cliché Polish romantic comedy. 

This movie's storyline is little except for a collection of clichés we have seen in a million romantic comedies before. Truth be told these clichés have also been done a million times better. This is not helped by the fact that this entire film's plot revolves around every character being a complete idiot. The female lead (Adrianna Chlebicka) leads two lives, one as a model and one as a teacher. The difference as a model she wears a wig, no glasses and more revealing clothing. Yet the story centers around no one (except for a third grader (Helena Mazur)) being able to tell the difference between these two even when they spend an extensive amount of time together in both her ways of dressing. If this was carried off in a farcical way it could have worked, but no we are simply supposed to except that nobody would truly recognize any similarities. The character herself has little personality outside of being a good person and therefore never feels real to us. Our male lead (Mateusz Banasiuk) is not much better. While all male leads in a movie like this need to have a bit of a character arc, it should be handled better than this. The arc itself feels incredibly rushed and he seems to have changes in his personality for no reason whatsoever. There is no transition between this personality changes they just kind of occur. Like our female lead this character is equally bland and uninteresting, with the only real difference being that he can be a bit of a jerk at times. Like too many romantic comedies these days, there is often little to no focus on the comedy. This is just as well because its attempts at doing comedy mostly fall flat, though one wishes that this movie could have at least kidded the absurdity of its premise.  

This is a bottom of the barrel romantic comedy all the way.    

Tuesday, November 10, 2020

Movie Review: Operation Christmas Drop

 



Note: This movie is only available on Netflix as far as I know. 

Michael's Movie Grade: C+

Charming, if very familiar Christmas romantic comedy. 

What makes this movie work is that the two main characters are simply so likable. Much of this is thanks to the performances of Kat Graham and Alexander Ludwig. The two bring such charm to these characters. The character arcs for both them are believable and relatable. The story moves at an easygoing pace that perfectly suits the material. The story may be cliché but it never feels forced and the sweetness of the film feels completely natural as well. This movie is not only a movie that takes place at Christmas, but one that is just completely full of Christmas from beginning to end. Because of this the film is sure to give Christmas lovers like me their Christmas fix, which is just what its target audience is looking for. 

Strangely the weakest part of this movie is the romance itself. There is nothing wrong with the chemistry between the two main characters but it just never feels like a love story. Instead these characters simply feel like good friends with nothing romantic between them. It makes one wish that the filmmakers could have simply made this a movie where the two leads simply become good friends, but sadly that is not how the cliché works, so that is not what is going to happen in this film. Also what the heck is up with the obviously CGI gecko?

This is not going to be anyone's favorite movie, but it has more than enough Christmas and charm to give its target audience just what it wants. 

-Michael J. Ruhland   

Saturday, September 12, 2020

Movie Review: Broken Hearts Gallery

 

Michael's Movie Grade: C

An enjoyable but strictly cookie cutter romantic comedy. 

This movie follows all the traditional romantic comedy conventions that we know by heart. I will be the first to say though that there is a reason that these clichés have become conventions and that is that they work and the conventions work here. The story while cliché is involving and even though we know what will happen we still like to see it happen. The two stars (Geraldine Viswanathan, Dacre Montgomery) also have really good chemistry and it is fun to watch how they play off one another. Geraldine Viswanathan actually is able to make a character that could easily be annoyingly over the top likable and I am impressed by that. There is also a surprisingly somewhat touching scene in this film (for those of you who have seen it it is the one in the old folks home). 

On the downside this movie wants to be a quirky version of a romantic comedy, but unfortunately this quirkiness too often feels forced. Often times it is indeed quirky but not actually funny. While there are definitely some funny moments here the humor misses just as much as it hits if not not more. The couple themselves have some funny moments, but the humor that comes from their friends feels like it is trying much too hard. However one of my main problems with this film is that as much as I try I fail to see why anyone would want to see a gallery of useless junk people kept from past relationships. I personally would much rather see actual art as I am sure most of you would. 

This movie will probably not be one you will revisit often, but for what it is it provides you with a fun trip to the movies. 

-Michael J. Ruhland 

Monday, May 4, 2020

Movie Review: The Half of It

Michael's Movie Grade: C+

This Netflix romantic comedy falls quite short of what it is trying to be but the chemistry between the two main stars and some good humor make this work.

This is a rare romantic comedy where a nonromantic friendship is treated as just as important to the plot as the romance and is frankly a lot more interesting. The story has Ellie (Leah Lewis) writing love letters for her friend Paul (Daniel Diemer), only to fall for the girl he has a crush on. Whenever either is with their crush, Aster (Alexxis Lemire), the film comes to a screeching halt. Neither has much of a chemistry with her and this makes these scenes very bland and kinda boring. There are plenty of people who will applaud this movie for having a possible lesbian love story, but regardless of intentions it is still rather poorly done. However what works extremely well here is the friendship between Ellie and Paul. This is the saving grace for this movie and overcomes many of the film's faults. There is a true sweetness to this relationship. This is not a friendship that you ever thought would happen and if it did you would assume they would have little to talk about, yet it grows into something completely real and beautiful. With so many films favoring a beautiful romance over a beautiful friendship, this gave the movie a strong appeal to me. I have had deep friendships that have meant the world to me and it seems strange that these beautiful relationships hardly get their due in movies. There are even scenes between the two of them that can be described as much more than lovely.

This is a romantic comedy so of course there has to be comedy. While some of this comedy does fall very flat, the comedy that works is delightful and certainly brightens up the film.

Despite being in many ways an unusual romantic comedy, this movie does fall into many of the clichés. This is especially true concerning dialogue and many of the side characters personalities. The narration at the beginning almost turned me off feeling much too forced and like what I have heard in other movies many times. The love interest is as bland and uninteresting of a character as can be, spouting off cliché lines like we are supposed to view them as beautiful or deep. The bullies are certainly the worst part. They have no personality and spout off cliché bully lines that have been in movies for decades. What makes them worse is that the story would have worked just as well without them or their clumsy dialogue.   

This is a very faulted movie, yet what works does really work.

-Michael J. Ruhland 

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Michael's Christmas Movie Guide: Holiday Affair (1949)


Holiday Affair is an extremely delightful example of a classic romantic comedy. With how romantic comedies have such a bad reputation today, it is easy to forget how many delightful romantic comedies were made during the 1930's and 40's with seemingly effortless charm. Setting this movie around my favorite time of year, only adds to its charm.

Connie Ennis (Janet Leigh) is a war widow with a young son named Timmy (Gordon Gelbert), who makes her living as a comparative shopper. Connie goes to buy a toy train for her job. When she brings it home Timmy thinks it is a Christmas present for him, and is disappointed when she goes to return it. When she does return it, a clerk named Steve (Robert Mitchum) has figured out what Connie's job is. He is supposed to turn her in but when he finds out that she is a war widow with a kid he decides not to. This ends up getting him fired. To make it up to him Connie takes him out for dinner. This ends up making her boyfriend, Carl Davis (Wendell Correy) jealous. When she takes him home he meets Timmy. Learning that Timmy wants a toy train like her mother returned, he buys him one for Christmas. This act causes tons of trouble.

This was one of only five movies directed by Don Hartman. The other four were It Had to be You (1947), Every Girl Should be Married (1948), Mr. Imperium (1951) and It's a Big Country: An American Anthology (1951). He was more prolific as a writer. Some of his writing credits include Road to Singapore (1940), Road to Zanzibar (1941), Road to Morocco (1942), The Gay Deception (1935) and My Favorite Blonde (1942).

Robert Mitchum was an odd choice for the lead in a lighthearted romantic comedy like this. He was mostly associated with tough guy roles. An advertisement in Box Office Barometer stated "Here's a new kind of warm romantic role for Mitchum and a new kind of thrill for you". To add to this he had been arrested the previous year for possessing marijuana. However Howard Hughes, who owned RKO refused to drop Mitchum's contract, despite the fact that most studios would have dropped a star after something like that. Janet Leigh was surprised to learn that Mitchum despite his rough image, was an extremely dedicated actor. He did play some practical jokes while working but none of them were mean spirited and he was certainly giving his all to his work.

This film was a box office failure when first released, but fortunately has gained a dedicated following today that is well deserved. To many of us it has become a Christmas classic.

No word describes this movie better than delightful. Every scene of the film is just so enjoyable to watch. The movie is full of great dialogue and the chemistry between the whole cast is absolutely perfect. The climax is a prefect example of classic screwball comedy. Most of all though this movie just moves at a fast breezy pace, and never loses an audience's interest.

An issue of Showman's trade review talked about an interesting promotion for the film. Here Charles E. Lewis wrote "Santa Claus stayed around Ashbury Park and Morristown, N.J., for an extra week to ballyhoo 'Holiday Affair' the New Year's Eve attraction at Reade's Asbury Mayfair and Morristown Community theaters. St. Nick walked around the streets bearing this sign: 'I'm staying around until New Year's Eve to see 'Holiday Affair'.' Active in persuading the jolly old gentleman to hang around were Ashbury City Manager Guy Hevina and Morristown City Manager Ralph Lanterman."

-Michael J. Ruhland
Resources Usedhttp://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/78191/Holiday-Affair/articles.html

Monday, November 11, 2019

Movie Review: Last Christmas

Michael's Movie Grade: B

A sweet and charming Christmas movie.

I will be honest, I adore Christmas movies. It doesn't matter how sweet and sappy they get, I still adore them. This is probably why I am more susceptible to this film's charms than a lot of critics were. True this film offers nothing new and can often feel too much like a tradition romcom for some, but it is genuinely heartwarming and that is just what I want from a Christmas movie. Much of this charm comes from the film's lead actress, Emilia Clarke. Unlike many of you, I have never seen an episode of Game of Thrones, but even with never having seen that Emilia has left quite an impression on me through her movies (for all the film's faults, her performance in Me Before You, especially impressed me). This movie only makes me appreciate her more. Watching her here, I can see her making an incredible career in lighthearted comedies. She brings such a simple and seemingly effortless charm to this type of role. She tells you more about her character through simple expressions in her face than could ever be told in dialogue. She commands the screen each time she appears, bringing the perfect amount of energy to this role. Despite being known for his over the top and often very vulgar slapstick comedies, director Paul Feig does a surprisingly good job in this more low key movie. You can tell that he is truly a fan of this type of Christmas movie and gives himself fully into the pure sappy sentimentality. There is a full sense of sincerity here that is completely and utterly charming.

This movie may be sappy and corny, but sometimes that is just what you want from a Christmas movie and this movie gives Christmas addicts like me their much needed fix of Christmas cheer. So just sit back and let the holiday spirit overcome you.

-Michael J. Ruhland      

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Movie Review: Tod@s Caen

Michael's Movie Grade: C+

An enjoyable little romantic comedy from Mexico.

A man (Omar Chaparro) believes he fully understands how to manipulate any woman he dates. A woman (Martha Higareda, who also cowrote the screenplay) believes she can manipulate any man she dates. When they end up falling for each other, the relationship is harder than either one planned. If this sounds like a very typical romantic comedy plot, that is because it is. Anyone who knows the genre even a little can tell you what is going to happen from beginning to end. However even if this movie is cliché it can be really fun at times. The main relationship very likable and you do want these two to end up with each other. There is a real sweetness behind both of them that keeps them from being the bland male and female stereotypes, they could have easily been. The idea of the main characters being able to break the fourth wall and talk directly to the audience was definitely a good one, and give this movie more of its own identity. I also think it is very clever how Mia talks to the women in the audience while Adan talks to the men. As well as our two main characters a romance between their friends (Mauricio Barrientos, Claudia Alvarez) is actually quite sweet and charming. The humor can be quite hit and miss to be honest. Watching Mauricio's character unsuccessfully flirt with a woman in a grocery store makes you feel sorry for him rather than laugh. Same thing happens when he later talks to his girlfriend's mother and gets nervous. A similar thing happens when our main male character ends up a party without his clothes. Embarrassment humor can be a difficult thing to pull off and this movie isn't able to do it. However on the other hand scenes that derive from the characters verbally trying to one up the other are quite funny.

This movie is never going to be considered a classic and may not be one you will think about much. But for what it ends, it provides a fun trip to the movies.

-Michael J. Ruhland    

Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Tokyo Fiancée (2014)

I’d be hard pressed to find a romantic comedy more offbeat than this overlooked Belgian movie, Tokyo Fiancée. As offbeat as this film is it is actually based off a true story. It is an adaption of Amélie Nothomb's autobiographical book of the same name.

 Amélie (Pauline Étienne) was born in Japan and lived there until she was five. Afterward her family moved to Belgium. Partly because of this she is obsessed with Japanese culture and wants to be Japanese more than anything. At the age of 20 she takes a job as a French language tutor. There she falls for her student, Rinri (Taichi Inoue). However she soon learns being born in Japan and liking Japanese culture, do not make her accepted as Japanese. I do not wish to give away more here. While most romantic comedies are very predictable this movie isn’t. There is quite a bit I did not see coming.

This is a very fun and very charming movie. A huge reason for this is Pauline Étienne’s fantastic performance as Amélie. She brings such charm and likability to this movie. Her performance is irresistibly quirky. She brings a lot of offbeat humor to this movie, yet she always feels completely human and believable. You are always emotionally attached to this character, and this is what makes the movie work so great. She also has fantastic chemistry with Taichi Inoue, and their relationship is completely believable. Her quirky, but touching performance fits this movie perfectly as the movie often shifts tone from a silly quirky comedy to a much more serious film. Like her performance though this movie transitions perfectly and believably between these different tones. Director and writer Stefan Liberski does perfect job combining those two elements and has found an actress who could sell what Liberski does perfectly. The match of director and actress could not be better.

These movie also brings up fascinating and thought-provoking ideas about very cultures and how these cultures view each other, as we see our main character’s hopes of being considered Japanese dashed by the elitism of those around her fiancée.   

If you are looking for a romantic comedy that is not just the same story we have seen a million times, this movie will do perfectly.

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

Michael's Christmas Movie Guide: Love Affair (1939)



Leo McCarey was one of the all time great American filmmakers (and my personal favorite director). He is often given credit for coming up with the idea to team Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. He directed the Marx Brothers in Duck Soup, and Harold Lloyd in The Milky Way. He also directed such classics as The Awful Truth, Going My Way, Make Way For Tomorrow, and The Bells of Saint Mary. I personally amazed Leo's name is rarely mentioned among such other greats of comedy direction during the 1930's and 40's such as Frank Capra and Preston Sturges. Leo is definitely one of the greats of screwball comedy.  With a director this good it is no wonder this film is so great.

Almost unbelievable for a film this great there was never a complete script. Pages of the script were changed almost daily. The actors never memorized the lines, because they felt they could easily be changed the next day. The rewrites were done for a reason. The first part of this film was more light-hearted and the second half was more dramatic. One suggestion was by Charles Boyer himself. He suggested a scene involving his character's grandmother (played by Maria Ouspenskaya) would play a bigger role in the story.

The story involves a man named Michel (played by Charles Boyer) and a woman named Terry (played by Irene Dunne). They meet on a boat and fall deeply in love with each other, despite the fact that both are engaged. They arrange to meet on the Empire State building. Unfortunately on her way there, Terry is hit by a car and becomes temporarily paralyzed. Terry doesn't want Michel to know she is paralyzed, so she can run to him when she is better. Michel is hurt by this as he doesn't know what happened. They meet again on Christmas, before Terry becomes better and she is afraid to admit it to him. However this meeting will change both their lives.

This movie is incredible. Everything in it is as good as it can be. The acting is great, the writing is fantastic, and the direction is as good as can be. The characters are more than just romantic comedy stereotypes and are very well thought out characters. On top of the comedy and romance, this movie features some fairly profound moments as well like those involving the grandmother. I couldn't recommend this movie more. By the way I am not the only one who holds this film in such a high regard. The film's stars Charles Boyer and Irene Dunne called this their personal favorite film they worked on.

Leo McCarey himself remade the film in 1957 as An Affair to Remember.

Below is an advertisement for the film in Boxoffice Magazine.The following is an exhibitor's review from The Motion Picture Herald (dated August 5, 1939)

"Love Affair: Irene Dunne, Charles Boyer - Very much enjoyed by my patrons. A refreshing story and the kids were great. Can recomend this one. Running Time 80 minutes. Played July 6 - A.L. Dove, Bengough Theatre, Bengough, Saskatchewan, Canada. Rural and small town panronage."

The following is another exhibitor's review from The Motion Picture Herald (dated May 27, 1939).

"Love Affair:  Irene Dunne, Charles Boyer - Although this did not draw as we expected it to, it certianly did please.Running time 89 minutes. Played April 25-26. - A.N. Miles, Eminice Theatre, Eminience, Ky. Small Town and rural pantroange."

Here is another exhibitor's review from The Motion Picture Herlad (dated October 28, 1939).

"Love Affair: Irene Dunne, Charles Boyer - Irene Dunne was born just a few miles from here and the local folks just lay a little claim to her because she is a Hoosier. She is always a good draw no matter how often played. 'Love Affair' is one of her best so they all said and that is good enough for me. Running Time 89 minutes. Played October 4-5. - Jim Haney, Milan Theatre, Milan, Ind. General pantroange."

-Michael J. Ruhland

Resources Used
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/3938/Love-Affair/articles.html