Thursday, January 18, 2018

Movie Review: Mary and the Witch's Flower

Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland











Michael's Movie Grade: A+

Review: Studio Ponoc's first feature film is an absolutely spellbinding movie that takes hold of its audience and never lets go.

One thing that makes this movie so incredible is the character of Mary. She is a very well thought out and somewhat complex character. She is also a character that I (and I am sure many others) find very easy to relate to. She is extremely caring and only wants to help everybody around her, but her clumsiness often times results in trouble. This right off the bat makes her far from faultless but always likable and well intentioned. Despite her often messing things up, it never stops or hurts her pure determination. She has a one track mind and nothing can stop her once she sets out to do something. She is simply incapable of looking back and must always look forward to what is a head of her. While this also gets her in plenty of trouble it makes us admire her and want to be more like her.

As well as a great lead character this movie has an incredibly effective sense of pure fantasy. This movie makes it truly feel like you are stepping out on an incredible adventure with Mary. This works especially well because we get to know and care for her before the true fantasy happens. This makes the fantasy much more magical because we are discovering it along with the main character. This fantasy is also enhanced by the incredible visuals. The design and animation are easily on par with the earlier Studio Ghibli work from many these filmmakers. This film is unbelievable visually stunning and easily the best looking movie currently in theaters.

This movie is a must watch and I am very excited to see what Studio Ponoc has in store for us.

-Michael J. Ruhland.


   

 

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Movie Review: Condorito: The Movie

Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland



















Michael's Movie Grade: B-

Review: Turn your mind off, accept the silliness and just have fun. This movie does not have ambitions of being anything but a dumb comedy, however as a dumb comedy it is actually quite funny.

Two things really make this work that is the humor and the main character. The humor is off the wall and completely silly, but somehow works very well. As silly as this humor is it seems to fit so naturally into the world of the film. More than this though the jokes actually are quite funny. Watching the film I knew these jokes were really corny, but that didn't stop me from laughing at many of them. There is also something so enjoyable and irresistible about the fact that this movie never stops to take its self seriously and continually throws good humor at us. Adding to this is the fact that the title character is so likable. Sure he is a lazy goof off, but he is so well intentioned that we always like him and feel like we are on his side. They is never any malice in his action and there is something of ourselves we can always see in home.

This movie does still have a few problems. Condorito's love interest seems very undeveloped as does his rival for her. These characters seem exactly like ones we have seen quite a few times before in other movies. The alien space ship also seems rather blandly designed, and there are a few times when the lower budget of the animation really shows.

It is hard to explain why this movie is so enjoyable, but if you just turn your brain off and let yourself have fun, you might enjoy yourself like I did.

-Michael J. Ruhland
   

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Dress like Cubby Bear and Watch a Cartoon as Well.

Have you ever dreamed of dressing like Cubby Bear? While it turns out you are not alone, or if this was 1934 and you were a little kid, you would not be alone. For those of you who are unaware, Cubby Bear was a cartoon character created by the Van Buren Studio for various animated short subjects. Cubby Bear was one of the many American cartoon characters of his era to essentially be a copy of Mickey Mouse. His design was extremely similar to Mickey and his personality is exactly the same. This was nothing new for the Van Buren studio, they had been taken to court by Walt Disney himself after using a boy and a girl mouse who looked exactly like Mickey and Minnie in the cartoons A Close Call and Western Whoppee. Cubby first appeared in the 1932 cartoon Opening Night. However while doing some research I found a rather interesting mention of Cubby Bear in a 1934 article in the Broadway and Hollywood Movies magazine. By 1934 RKO was interesting distributing both Van Buren cartoons and Disney cartoons, and so this is mentioned right after discussing the Disney classic The Three Little Pigs. The article states "RKO Radio Pictures also release the Cubby Bear, and his sweetheart, series of animated cartoons. So popular are they growing that one of the RKO officials has asked Claire Julianne, a well know New York stylist, to design children's clothes for manufacturing purposes; based on the Cubby Bear idea." The idea of Cubby Bear being this popular seems very strange today as the character is forgotten by almost everyone who is not an animation buff. As someone who enjoys the Cubby Bear cartoons, I would have personally liked to have seen these. Below is the article itself if you would like to see it.




Don't go away too soon though because we have a cartoon as well. Naturally this is a Cubby Bear cartoon, and one of the most interesting of the lot. Though most Cubby Bear cartoons were produced on the east coast at the Van Buren Studio, this was one of the two cartoons (the other being Cubby's World Flight) that were produced on the west coast by Hugh Harmon and Rudolph Ising. Van Buren loaned out these two shorts and it shows. Hugh Harmon and Rudolph Ising had produced and directed the Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies cartoons from 1930 to 1933. As such this is a remake of the first Merrie Melody cartoon, Lady Play Your Mandolin. In fact the background characters are exactly the same and except for the two main character looking different many shots look exactly the same. You may note the title card for the following cartoon is titled a Brownie Bear cartoon. This is because the cartoons were rereleased under this name when Official Films sold the cartoons as home 16mm movie prints. So without further ado from 1933, here is The Gay Gaucho.
















-Michael J. Ruhland





Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Movie Review: The Greatest Showman

Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland


















Michael's Movie Grade: C+

Review: An entertaining movie that is fun to watch, but still makes you feel it could have been better.

This movie does have quite a bit going for it. Our main character (yes I know P. T. Barnum is a real person but this is a fictionalized version of him) is highly enjoyable and likable. We understand his struggle and relate to him on that level very well. Throughout this whole film I always believed this character and felt emotionally involved in him. The main story while cliché is charming and enjoyable. It is a simple story and its charm is in this basic simplicity that we can all relate too. The musical numbers aren't as beautifully choreographed as can be seen in any number of films from Hollywood's golden age, but they are big and feel big. They make you understand why audiences would have easily been attracted to this type of entertainment and this is something that is essential to this movie working as it helps you accept what you see on screen. The songs themselves (while admittedly are not my type of music) are well written and always help to advance the story.

On the downside, while P.T. Barnum is very well developed, the other characters don't seem to be given this luxury. At the end of the movie, I did not feel like I knew any of them. On top of this the subplots with them feel very rushed, undeveloped and cliché. It is true that the main story also is cliché, but since it is more developed it doesn't feel as obvious as this problem is in the subplots. One romance especially seems to come out of nowhere and all of the sudden become a big part of the story. Those who have seen enough movies will also know everything that is going to happen in this romance. Another subplot about ballet seems horrible forced in and we are not allowed enough time personally with the character this subplot is about to become emotionally attached enough to this story point.

All and all this is a fun movie, but one that could have been quite a bit better.

-Michael J. Ruhland
       
 

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Movie Review: Ferdinand

Movie Review Written by Michael J. Ruhland















Michael's Movie Grade: B

Review: I am sure there are quite a few animation buffs like me who when they first heard about this movie immediately thought of the 1938 short Disney cartoon called Ferdinand The Bull. However no fears as this movie is more than different enough to not be confused with the earlier short and it stands on its own as a very enjoyable movie.

This movie does quite a good job making a short children's book into an hour and 48 minute feature film. With the exception of one chase seeming a bit too long, the movie never seemed to drag and moved at a brisk fun pace. One way this movie expands on the book is to add more backstory for Ferdinand himself. What is surprising is that this back story is quite touching and may be the best part of this movie. This back story has its dark elements, and it never tries to sugarcoat them and have the movie talk down to its audience. This creates a very involving emotional connection to our title character that is strongly felt at many points in this movie. The animation is also quite top notch. I always feel Blue Sky never gets the credit they deserve for how well animated their films are, and this movie is very well animated. Every character moves with such energy and emotion that you believe in them. They can convey emotions so clearly that it pulls you much more into the movie.

The jokes are very hit and miss as some of them are good and some are bad. The good jokes are actually quite funny though and I found myself laughing at many of them in a way I didn't quite except. But still the bad jokes can make someone groan, but I sat through a preview of Sherlock Gnomes before the movie and that made them not seem so bad. The main fault in this movie is sometimes it does feel like you have seen it before, there is nothing new offered here and the movie doesn't take many risks that haven't been done successfully before. I would have also liked the quiet scenes to have lasted a little bit longer, so that we could have spent more time reflecting on the emotional parts before heading to the next scene.

Even admitting those faults though I had a lot of fun watching this movie and felt an emotional connection to the main character, so with that said this movie does what it sets out to do very well and I easily recommend it if you just want to have a good time at the movies.

-Michael J. Ruhland


    

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Movie Review: Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle

Review Written by Michael J. Ruhland


















Michael's Movie Grade: B

Review: Surprisingly very fun film.

This movie may not be extremely original, but it doesn't try to be. Instead it is happy just being a fun little action/comedy and it successeds very well at that. Probably the best thing about this movie is the humor. Much of the comedy is actually laugh out loud hilarious. This is because while this movie follows many movie conventions, it makes just as much fun of them. It is a movie that never takes itself to seriously and that is its charm. Helping make this humor even better is the performances from the actors. Jack Black turns in a fantastically funny performance here. The idea of a materialistic and obsessed with herself teenage girl in Jack Black's body may sound like a joke that would get old quick but it doesn't, because Jack Black plays the part so well. He is obviously having a lot of fun playing this role and so we have a lot of fun watching him play it. This character even manages to get one of the funniest pee jokes I have seen in recent movies. Dwayne Johnson is equally great playing a somewhat stereotypical nerd that is now all the sudden in The Rock's body. Kevin Hart is a comedian, I sometimes find funny and other times unbearably obnoxious. This is one of his better roles and he delivers some good laughs. Karen Gillan is given less to work with for most of this film as she mostly plays the straight role, but she does well with what she has and in the one scene where she is allowed to shine, she sure does. Even more than just the characters themselves though, this movie has great relationships between the characters. You simply enjoy watching them interact with one another and feel that they make each other stronger.

This isn't a perfect movie though and it has some problems. One of these is a weak villain. With the tongue in cheek humor through much of this film, it seems it could have had a much more enjoyable villain that is maybe a parody of movie or video game villains. However all he delivers is nothing but blandness and one disgusting image that this film would have been better without. The world the movie takes place in sadly also seems to be just a generic fantasy world with nothing new to offer. There could have definitely been more imagination that went into this aspect.  There is also that fact that before entering the game the movie doesn't seem that interesting. It is not bad per say but it almost feels like a weaker version of The Breakfast Club (still when they enter the game the movie finally gets going and this easily makes up for that fault).

From the previews this movie did not look good to me at all. So I was very pleasantly surprised by just how much fun I had watching it, and if you watch it I hope you have fun too.

-Michael J. Ruhland
     

Monday, January 1, 2018

Silent Film of the Month: The First Auto (1927)

Run Time: 75 minutes. Studio: Warner Brothers. Director: Roy Del Ruth. Writers: Darryl F. Zanuck, Anthony Coldeway. Main Cast: Russell Simpson, Frank Campeau, Gibson Gowland, William Demarest. Producer: Darryl F. Zanuck. Cinematographer: David Abel.

Before we discuss this movie let me reminisce for a little bit. My grandpa was one of the closet friends a person could ever have and he meant more than the world to me. Being very close I heard some stories about his childhood various times. He often talked about how when he was growing up on a farm, his dad always insisted he use the horses for work. My grandpa was much more interested in cars. Anything with an engine in it fascinated him and he didn't understand why he had to use the horses when everybody else was using motorized tractors. Though this film's story is not the same as my grandpa's story, the conflict in this movie does remind me of my grandpa's story and because of this I would like to dedicate this post to the memory of him.
The film takes place in 1895. Bob (Played by Charles Emmet Mack) is the son of a champion horse racer named Hank Armstrong (played by Russell Simpson). Bob is obsessed with cars, despite the fact that his father hates them with a passion. This already causes a rift between father and son. When Bob gets a job in Detroit he sees famous race car driver Barney Oldfield (played by himself) breaking the all time speed record. This inspires Bob to compete in a car race around the country, which causes an even greater rift between him and his father.

Despite being only 27 when appearing in this film, The First Auto was one of Charles Emmett Mack's last movies. After this film he would only appear in one more movie (The Rough Riders (released the same year)). His career was just getting started around this time. It had officially begun in 1921 (With the movie Dream Street), however as it started he was playing mostly small roles. The First Auto was one of his first real staring roles. His career was unfortunately cut short because he would pass away in an auto accident. One wonders where his career would have gone if he did not pass away so young as his performance in The First Auto is very good.

Also in this movie's cast is William Demarest. This was Demarest's first year of screen acting and was well before he became a huge star. He would go on to appear in many of Preston Sturges' movies of the 1940's with such films as Sullivan's Travels, The Great McGinty, The Lady Eve, The Palm Beach Story, Hail The Conquering Hero, Christmas in July and The Miracle of Morgan's Creek. He would also go on to play Uncle Charley in TV's My Three Sons.

Using Barney Oldfield in the film was a great way to get the movie some publicity. William A. Johnson wrote for an article (dated May 20th, 1927), "I saw on the Warner lot an odd assortment of automobiles, beginning with the first one that raced a horse and so on up to Barney Oldfield's famous racer '999'. These curiosities have been used in 'The First Auto'. Jack Warner is fascinated by this and also about 'Old San Francisco' with Dolores Costello. He promises a very human and novel picture in 'The First Auto'."

According to Fitzhugh Green's book The Film Finds It's Tongue, The Frist Auto was the first movie to be shot with incandescent lighting for its entirety. Also according to this book this process was not kept a secret and many studios were allowed to come and see how the lighting was done and that within six months all the major Hollywood studios used this kind of lighting. This is further confirmed by the William A. Johnson article quoted earlier as he went on to write about the movie "The latter picture by the way, has been made with Mazda lamps, the first to be turned out here with this new studio illumination"   

This movie was directed by Roy Del Ruth one of the most reliable studio directors of the 1920's, 30's and 40's. His work as a whole never had its own unique identity in the way that Alfred Hitchcock or other auteur directors had, but regardless of what he was directing the majority of his films were of high quality. This film is no exception. This movie is extremely charming. There is no doubt that this movie is extremely sentimental. However it is fully honest sentiment here that naturally flows out of the characters and story. While 1895 seems to us like an impossibly long time ago, it is important to remember that in 1927 many people who were alive then would be old enough to remember that year and have a certain nostalgic connection with it. This movie plays on that nostalgia and certainly that is where much of the sentiment comes from. Still with this movie's tight storytelling and great performances from the actors, it holds up quite well today, and may even make someone fell nostalgic for a time that was well before they were born. I will admit that I am a sucker for sentimental films (even when they are corny), when done well, and this one is certainly done well.

Below is an advertisement for the film from an issue of the magazine Exhibitors Herald.


 

-Michael J. Ruhland

Resources Used
http://mediahistoryproject.org/
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/767/The-First-Auto/articles.html
The Film Find its Tongue by Fitzhugh Green