Monday, May 22, 2017

Movie Review: Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2

 


Review written by Michael J. Ruhland



















Michael's Movie Grade: B+


Review: A very fun movie that is highly recommended.

This movie successeds on many levels. The characters are very likable and relatable. By the end of the film we feel that we completely know the main characters. Unlike a lot of these type of movies it does not confuse backstory with personality and understands that a good backstory can never be a replacement for likability. Though there is a lot of backstory here, the main focus is these characters and simply what made people like them so much in the first film (or comics for that matter). The backstory however is quite interesting and really complements the character. As well as this even though they are often comic relief, Rocket and Baby Groot are just as likable and real as any of the other characters, and who can't like Baby Groot. The humor in this film is fantastic. There are very few jokes that miss, and some jokes are flat out fantastic (Baby Groot and that toe especially). The music once again complements the action perfect and makes the scenes more exciting, funny, emotional and of course the songs fit Star Lord's character perfectly.

On the downside, the story while good has been done before and it is not hard to guess the movie's twist. This film is very similar to many other superhero movies, story wise. Gomorra's side story with her sister, honestly could have just been dropped. It isn't bad at all, but it is very rushed and doesn't add much to the film. Maybe it could have been better if it was either the focus of the movie or just given more time, but as it is it is kind of the weakest part of the movie. Despite all this the movie is more than fun enough to make up for these faults and still comes out as an excellent movie.

-Michael J. Ruhland    

I am Groot.

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

Movie Review: Born in China

 




Review by Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade: B+


Review: Excellent film, is a pure delight especially on the big screen.


The nature photography in this film is absolutely incredible. Like Disney does so often in these films, I haven't the slightest idea how they got the shot, but I am too busy being amazed that I don't think about that until after the film. This is a movie that will definitely be better if you see it in a theater (though most movies are better in the theater (except obviously those made for TV)). From the first shot you feel as if you have been transported to China.


However this film does have a fairly big downside and that is John Krasinski's narration. While it isn't all bad it certain does get in the way. The attempts at humor through this narration (especially when he voices an animal character) fall really flat. There is also a really inappropriate use of the song, Burn This City, but that is so brief it will not affect your enjoyment of the film. Still these faults are completely overcome by the sheer beauty of the nature photography, which is so breathtaking, you can overlook these faults no problem.


By the way do not go away when the end credits start. There is plenty of great footage of the crew interacting with the animals. This is delightful, fun and would be worth the price of admission easily, even if the rest of the film didn't exist.


This film may have its faults, but if you are a nature lover like me, it is a must see, simply to see the beautiful nature photography.


-Michael J. Ruhland

Monday, May 1, 2017

Silent Film of the Month: Moran of the Lady Letty (1922)


Run Time: 71 minutes. Studio: Famous Players-Laskey Corporation. Director: George Melford. Writer: Monte M. Katterjohn. Based on a book by Frank Norris Producer: George Melford. Main Cast: Rudolph Valentino, Dorothy Dalton, Charles Brinley, Walter Long. Cinematographer: William Marshall.

A year earlier in 1921 (also the year of his breakthrough appearance in Rex Ingram's The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse), Rudolph Valentino had one of the biggest success of his career with The Sheik. This movie proved very popular especially with women. This was hugely due to his Latin lover persona. However the Famous Players-Lasky Corporation (later Paramount Pictures) noticed this image did not have the same effect on most male movie goers. Instead men seemed to find this image a bit off putting. Because of this the studio decided to put him in a role that would appeal more to men in the audience. So Valentino was put into my silent film of the month, Moran of the Lady Letty, which was a much more adventure based film in order to get him a male audience as well. George Melford who had directed Valentino in The Sheik would also direct him here. George Melford might be a name that clasic horror movie buffs will recognize as he directed the famous Spanish language version of 1931's Dracula.

Melford had stated in interviews hinted that this movie would show Valentino in a very athletic and almost Douglas Fairbanksian light as he stated "find out what a husky, red-blooded chap he is." Melford also stated that "climbed to the very tip of the mast -- just for exercise. The hard-boiled crew of the ship gasped!" However it is impossible to say if that was actually true. One change was made however to make the role fit more into Valentino's Latin lover image. This was that writer Monte Katterjohn (who also worked on The Sheik) changed the main characters name from Russ Wilbur (the name in the book) to Ramon Laredo. An intertitle early in the film states "rich man's son spends the dash and fire inherited from his Spanish ancestors in leading cotillions."

As the story begins Moran (played by Dorothy Dalton) is happy living with her sea going father and she is love with the sea. Ramon (played by Rudolph Valentino) is however unhappy. He is rich, but his life is sheltered and he craves adventure. However all this changes when Ramon is shanghaied. The ship he is now aboard is ruled by a mean and hate filled captain (played by Walter Long (my fellow Laurel and Hardy fans will easily recognize him)). They run across a burning ship in trouble. The crew mostly just steals goods for them selves. However Ramon saves one of the sailors aboard that ship, more specifically Moran. Raman falls in love with Moran, but the lustful captain has his eyes on her, and Ramon must protect his new "mate".

This is an excellent film. The adventure filled climax is exciting to watch, and easily just as (and in many cases more) compelling than today's special effects filled action scenes. The chemistry between the two leads is fantastic and you really believe that these two grow to care for each other, even with their different backgrounds. The technical film making is also very well done. This film uses color tinting a lot, and extremely well. Color tinting is when the whole screen is tinted a certain color and it was used often in the silent era. While on the boat (except in the cabins) the screen is tinted blue, but the high society functions are tinted brown. This creates a great contrast and makes many of the more adventure filled scenes seem bigger and more exciting. Also the cutting between (slight spoilers ahead) Moran on the boat and Ramon at a fancy party towards the end is extremely effective as it lets us know that they are on each other's minds. The tinting also comes in handy here as it makes us see why the party is less appealing to Ramon. Also with dropping the Latin lover image I think this film is more accessible and enjoyable to many modern day audiences and all those who just don't like his Latin lover image, than most of Valentino's work is.

Despite his excellence in the lead role Valentino did not care for his role in this movie. He preferred playing more exotic types and felt a film like this hurt his Latin lover image. Because of this his later this same year he would play those type of characters again in Blood and Sand and The Young Rajah.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Resources Used
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/497111/Moran-of-the-Lady-Letty/articles.html

Monday, April 10, 2017

Movie Review: Boss Baby

 Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland









Michael's Movie Grade:C+


Review: DreamWorks has proven with the Kung Fu Panda trilogy (yes I know there are more coming and I am excited), that they can make an idea that seems bad on paper actually work. While this movie is not on the same level as Kung Fu Panda the filmmakers takes a seemingly terrible idea and makes a movie that is quite enjoyable.


While so many animated features today go out of their way to make their fantasy worlds seem as real as possible and for us to accept them as such, Boss Baby simply embraces the fact that it is a cartoon by simply having fun with how absurd it all is, and having a field day with their imaginations. This is the film's biggest asset. This is especially shown through Tim's various fantasies and daydreams. Taking a page out of Maurice Noble's design work for the Ralph Philips cartoons of the 1950's all of those working in DreamWorks art department create a vivid, but very stylized look to these daydreams, that is honestly a joy to look at. Also great to see is the fantastic design of Baby Corp., which is so imaginative that it creates a great sense of fun here. The idea of babies and puppies being created by companies rather than well you know is a great one that just helps add to the fun.


The characters are quite likable. While they might not be the best fleshed out characters in animation, they are not just the one joke characters that you might think they are from the previews.


On the downside for a comedy this film has very few laugh out loud moments. This isn't to say that the humor is bad, but I giggled and smiled more than I actually laughed out loud. There are some laugh out loud moments ("Your parents are Lennon and McCartney"), but there are just much fewer than there should be for a movie like this. Also while the film is full of imagination, it is not lacking in Clichés. There are many moments where you know just what is going to happen and I think many people will see the ending coming.


So this isn't Kung Fu Panda by any means it is a fun movie, and definitely worth a watch.


-Michael J. Ruhland     

Saturday, April 1, 2017

Silent Film of the Month: The Big Show (1923)






Run Time: 17 minutes. Studio: Hal Roach Studios Director: Robert McGowan. Writers: Hal Roach, H.M. Walker . Producer: Hal Roach. Main Cast: Mickey Daneils, Joe Cobb, Jackie Condon, Jack Davis, Allen "Farina" Haskins, Mary Koreman, Ernest Morrison, Richard Billings, Andy Samuel . Cinematographer: Len Powers.


Since I post a Silent Film of the Month article every 1st of the month, I feel it is only appropriate to post about a slapstick comedy short every April, in honor of April Fools Day. Last year I wrote about a classic Laurel and Hardy short, and this year I am writing about a classic Our Gang short. Who knows what I will post next year (Maybe Charlie Chaplin, maybe Harry Langdon, maybe Charley Chase, Maybe Buster Keaton, Maybe whoever else I feel like, I haven't decided about next year yet).


When one brings up Our Gang (or the Little Rascals), most people will think of Spanky, Alfalfa, and Buckwheat. However the team existed well before these characters. In fact the team was formed in 1922, back in the silent era. Since the series centered around kids actors and characters had to change (especially since the series ran until 1944). The group of kids from when The Big Show came out included Mickey Daniels, Joe Cobb, Jackie Cindon, Jack Davis, Allen "Farina" Haskins, Mary Koreman, Ernest "Sunshine Sammy" Morrison, Richard "Mugsy" Billings, and Andy Samuel. This is in fact the first Our Gang short for Andy Samuel. Andy had previously worked as an extra in Charlie Chaplin's classic 1921 feature film The Kid. While working on that film he learned how to imitate Charlie Chaplin. The basis for this short came as an excuse to let him show off his impression of Chaplin.


The film begins with the gang wanting to look at the county fair for free. They are naturally chased out of the fair. Because of this the gang decides to put on their own carnival with rides, animals and movies.


For all my fellow movie buffs, the highlight of this film is their moving picture show. Joe has a nonworking moving picture camera and pretends to project the film, while other kids on stage do impressions of various movie stars. These impressions include Charlie Chaplin, Douglas Fairbanks, William S. Hart and Harold Lloyd. The most elaborate of these is the Harold Lloyd impression. This sequence is a very elaborate redoing of various scenes from the 1922 feature Grandma's Boy only with kids as the actors. One gag is decidedly different though. In Grandma's Boy Harold is annoyed by cats and uses a statue of a dog to scare them off. However in this film the character is being annoyed by pigs, and holds a card that says "butcher" to scare them off. That feature film was done at the same studio as this one was and that may more than explain this. The Charlie Chaplin and Douglas Fairbanks sequences are also based on certain films those actors starred in but are much less elaborate. The Charlie Chaplin sequence recalls Chaplin's classic 1918 film Shoulder Arms, while the Douglas Fairbanks sequence recalls his performance as D'Artagnan in the 1921 film version of The Three Musketeers. As stated before the Chaplin imitation was done by Andy Samuel. The Douglas Fairbanks impression was provided by Mickey Daniels. While it is not certain who played the imitation of Harold Lloyd, Leonard Maltin and Richard W. Bann (according to their book Our Gang: The Life and Times of the Little Rascals) believe it was played by a child actor named Billy Lord. However this is still not certain.  


It has been stated that what makes Our Gang so great and beloved is that they have had the child hood we all wish we had. This is never more clear than it is in this film. After all who didn't as a kid want to create something like these kids created  here. What kid doesn't want to make their own movies, or work with wild animals, or simply have adventures like these kids do. Beyond all the great humor, this film is so charming because it is wish fulfillment for the child in all of us.


-Michael J. Ruhland


Resources Used


Our Gang: The Life and Times of Our Gang by Leonard Maltin and Richard W. Bann

Monday, March 27, 2017

Movie Review: Power Rangers

 

Power Rangers

Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland.
















Michael's Movie Grade:C

Review: A surprisingly good movie, even if it is far from a great one.

What surprisingly works well here is the characters and the emotional moments. This almost feels more like a Breakfast Club like movie, with teenagers who happen to be superheroes. Scenes like the one around the campfire as well as the Red and Pink Rangers speaking in his bedroom, were surprisingly kind of touching. To a much different extant Rita was an over the top and quite fun villain. I kind of miss these over-the-top villains and this one was definitely fun.

This film did however delve into a few clichés that I am so tired of and don't want to see anymore. One of these is a terribly written school bully, who is simply a walking stereotype of a school bully. Another one is (without giving anything away (not that you can't see it coming in the first place)) a scene where they try to make you think the film is going to do something we all know it isn't. Also surprisingly with how good the characters and emotional scenes are the big action scene is kind of underwhelming. It isn't bad but it could be much better.

I would complain about the Krispy Kreme product placement, but it was so ridiculous, I found it funny instead of annoying. There is even a scene where Rita stops in the middle of an action scene to eat a doughnut. Again this so over the top and silly that instead of finding this annoying it is downright funny.

Overall a good movie, even if it is far from a great one.

-Michael J. Ruhland.    

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Silent Film of the Month: Captain Salvation (1927)


Runtime: 87 minutes. Studio: MGM. Director: John S. Robertson. Writer: Jack Cunningham. Intertitles: John Colton. Producer: John S. Robertson. Main Cast: Lars Hanson, Marceline Day, Pauline Starke, Ernest Torrance. Cinematographer: William Daniels.

In many ways I consider the silent era the golden age of Christian films. While there are many great films with Christian messages released over the years the best ones seem to be from the silent era. These include such amazing films as Ben Hur: A Tale of the ChristSparrows (ok it may not be your typical Christian film but it definitely has a Christian Message), King of KingsNoah's Ark, the original Ten Commandments and this little hidden gem. As a Christian, myself I have a special fondness for the Christian films of the silent era.

This film's director was John S. Robertson. Robertson had begun his career in 1916 as both an actor and director however by 1918, he was directing and no longer acting. His directing career began by directing various comedy short for the Vitagraph studio. In 1917 he directed his first feature film Baby Mine. As a feature length director he would direct such movies as Dr. Jeckel and Mr. Hyde (1920) and The Enchanted Cottage. His career would last until 1935.

The star of this film was Lars Hanson, a name that is probably not as well remembered as it should be. Hanson began his film career in his home country of Sweden, with a lost 1916 film called Dolken. However he would not catch the attention of American movie makers until costarring (with Greta Garbo) in 1924's The Saga of Gösta Berling. This film was a huge international success and it wasn't long until MGM wanted to work with Lars Hanson. By the time he stared in Captain Salvation, he had already been in two gigantic box office successes for the MGM studio, The Scarlett Letter and The Flesh in the Devil (where he would once again costar with Great Garbo). Here his costars would be Marceline Day, Pauline Starke and Ernest Torrance. Torrance was one of the silent screen's greatest tough guys appearing in such films like Peter Pan (1924), Steamboat Bill Jr.The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923), The King of KingsTol'able David, and The Ruggles of Red Gap. He most often played villains like he does here, and was an operatic baritone before his film career. Marceline Day had a great talent for comedy. She started at the Mack Sennett studio, where she even appeared in films that starred Harry Langdon. Though over the course of her career she would appear in more dramatic movies such as this one and London After Midnight (the infamous lost film with Lon Chaney and directed by Tod Browning), she would still do much comedy, including being the leading lady opposite Buster Keaton in The Cameraman. In the 1930's unfortunately her career would go downhill and she would appear mostly in B pictures including The Telegraph Trail (with John Wayne, who would obviously later graduate from B pictures). Pauline Starke began her career as an extra in 1916, even appearing in such big films as D.W. Griffith's Intolerance. However she would work her way up to being a leading lady. As a leading lady she would appear in such films as The VikingEyes of YouthA Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court (1921) and Salvation Nell 

The film's story centers on a young man named Anson Campbell (played by Lars Hansen), who is as a title tells us torn between two loves. These are his love of serving God and of the sea. One day he sees a woman (probably a prostitute, though never directly stated) named Bess Morgan (played by Pauline Starke) being treated very harshly in his town, because she is sinful. He helps her out and takes care of her, but this ends up ruining his life with the town folks, his girlfriend (played by Marceline Day) and seemingly his ministry. Distraught he joins up with a ship hoping to leave it all behind. However Bess is on the ship, and the captain (played by Ernest Torrance) is not exactly the nicest of fellows. However this leads him to learn all that god actually has in store for him.

This is a fantastic movie in many ways. The story is really engaging, the acting is great, the film looks great (hugely thanks to cinematographer William Daniels) and the whole movie is just charming. Also adding to the movies charm is John Coulton's extremely well written and intelligently thought out intertitles. As all silent film fans know, poorly written intertitles can take their toll on other wise great films, but well written ones can make a great movie even better. Don't think that because I'm Christian and am praising a Christian movie that it does not hold much for non-Christians, this film has more than enough to satisfy any fan of silent cinema.

Resources Used
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2878/Captain-Salvation/articles.html
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0017735/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

-Michael J. Ruhland