Sunday, January 31, 2016

Movie Review: The Finest Hours

 


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland



















Michael's Movie Grade:B+

Review: Excellent and very fun adventure film. We have seen it all before, but it is done so expertly here.

The cinematography and editing in this film are down right fantastic, and even when the film is predictable it keeps and maintains an audience's attention. The action scenes are thrilling and edge of your seat fun. The acting is great. This truly an expertly made and very fun film. Helping to make this movie great is a fantastically well done old fashioned atomosphere.

However the film has one major fault. The romance is far too rushed. It is sweet and very likable, but more time needed to be spent on these two characters being together. In fact the beginning of the film just moves too fast, and really could use some slowing down.

Overall an excellent but faulted film.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Movie Review: The Big Short


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland
















Michael's Movie Grade: B-

Review: Adam McKay does a surprisingly good job directing such a different film from his usual style, but he could have done better on the script (though it isn't by any means bad).

The film has great direction, that is not afraid to blend more experimental film making with more mainstream film making. It is not as original as it seems to think it is, but it is still very well done. The writing is enjoyable, and fairly well thought out, but it is not up to par with the direction, and feels like it could have used another draft or so. Again the writing, while good seems to think it is more original than it is. The acting however is top notch and makes the script's weak points still enjoyable.

This is not a new masterpiece, but is a very well directed movie with an enjoyable, if underwhelming, script, and great acting.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Movie Review: Concussion

 


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland

















Michael's Movie Grade:B+

Review: Excellent film, may be formulaic but is so good you may not care.

This film is excellent at getting someone who is not interested in either sports or science (A.K.A. me) completely involved in it's story line. The main character is very likable, and we grow to care about him a lot (of course being played by Will Smith doesn't hurt this). Writer and Director Peter Landesman is really passionate about this subject and it shows, and he can make someone who doesn't usually share his passion, share it for the length of this film.

On the downside the romance should have been fleshed out more (it is not bad but it could be better), and the film at times confines itself to the typical style of this type of movie. However what is good is so good, you may not care about it's faults.

Regardless of your feelings toward this type of film, this is an excellent film that is well worth a watch.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Monday, January 4, 2016

Movie Review: Sisters

 


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland


















Michael's Movie Grade:F

Review: Unfunny, and immature comedy is just plain bad, despite good performances from the film's leads.

The main problem with this film is despite being a comedy it is never that funny. For this around two hour movie there are only one or two jokes that work. The two leads try hard to be funny, but their effort was wasted because the script was not funny to begin with. The humor is very immature. While that type of humor can work, it often times doesn't and this is a case where it doesn't. The worst thing about the film is the side characters. These are stereotypes of movie characters, and are just plain bland and annoying.

If you want a good laugh simply look elsewhere.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Saturday, January 2, 2016

Movie Review: Point Break


Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland
















Michael's Movie Grade:C-

Review: Decent time passer. Will never be remembered as a great movie, but isn't really that bad either.

The characters and story are all stuff we have seen before, and not just in the film this is a remake of, but in many many other films. While it is not done too bad here, it has still been done better elsewhere. The characters are likable, but they are also underdeveloped and been done better elsewhere. However on the bright side the action scenes are great. Doing them out in nature, is a nice change from the the usual city landscape for action scenes. These scenes also have fantastic cinematography. While the rest of the film isn't all bad, you really wish it was as good as thee action scenes are, but as it is this is a decent time passer. Don't go to this expecting a great film, but if you want to just spend some time at a movie theater, you could do worse.

-Michael J. Ruhland

Friday, January 1, 2016

Movie Review: Joy

 

Review Written By Michael J. Ruhland

Michael's Movie Grade:D

Review: This film tries hard, but sadly it is mostly just bland and overlong, despite a few good scenes.

The main character of this film is pretty likable, but unfortunately she is the only character in the film one feels like they actually get to know. The rest of the characters are just bland and boring. The actors give it a lot of effort and talent, but unfortunately they are given little to work with. On top of that you never truly feel the emotional connection to the story that director/writer David O Russell, seems to want you to feel. Still on top of that the movie just feels like it should have ended much earlier than it did. However there is some good humor (as well as some humor that misses the mark), and a couple of emotional scenes actually work well. Despite this Joy is mostly joyless.


-Michael J. Ruhland

Silent Film of the Month: The Ring (1927)

 


Run Time: 89 Minutes. Studio: British International Pictures. Director: Alfred Hitchcock. Writer: Alfred Hitchcock. Producer: John Maxwell. Main Cast: Carl Brisson, Lillian Hall-Davis, Ian Hunter, Forrester Harvey. Cinematographer: Jack Cox





Alfred Hitchcock has often times been rightfully referred to as the master of suspense. He is often the first name that comes into peoples minds when they think of thriller films. However many of these people would be surprised to see my silent film of the month. It is not a thriller, horror, or any similar type of movie. It is rather a romantic melodrama about a boxer fighting for his girl. However with films like this Hitchcock proved he was one of the greatest filmmakers that ever lived, no matter what genre he was working in.

When The Ring was made Hitchcock had not yet moved to Hollywood. He was still making films in Britain. In fact The Ring was his forth feature film. He had only made one suspense movie at this time and that was the film right before this, The Lodger. Producer John Maxwell had seen this film and since The Lodger was a huge hit was very surprised by Hitchcock's decision not to follow it with another thriller. What is interesting about Hitchcock's British period is that the films he made there did not always fit into what people associate him with today. At this time he was not known as the master of suspense, but rather as a director who did a wide variety of different genres.

This film is written by Hitchcock himself. Hitchcock is not known as a writer. In fact he would stop being his own writer in the 1940's. Most other films Hitchcock wrote on were based off of books, and plays. So this is a very rare completely original screen play by him. It is also the only film Hitchcock wrote by himself without any co-writers.One reason Hitchcock would later stop writing his own screenplays was that he thought in mainly visual terms, and dialog did not come naturally. However this works just great when he was handling a silent film like this.

In this film two boxers, "One Eyed" Jack Sander (played by Carl Brisson) and Bob Croby (played by Ian Hunter), fight over a woman (played by Lillian Hall-Davis), both in and out of the boxing ring. The title refers to the boxing ring, a wedding ring, and a symbolic snake bracelet. Jack is a carnival attraction, and people pay to see and to fight him. Members of the audience try and see if they can last more than one round in a boxing match with Jack. In comes Bob, who not only stays more than one round with Jack, but also wins the match. Jack's girlfriend develops an interest in Bob, and Bob an interest in her. At the same time, Bob's manger is impressed with Jack and has him join the same boxing torment as Bob. Jack upon hearing this news figures he has finally made it big, and marries his girlfriend. However Jack suspects that Bob is interested in his new wife, and vows to fight for his girl in the boxing ring. However when he finds that his wife might be interested in Bob, the fight for his girl, becomes a fight for revenge.

Hitchcock, even though he wrote the film, interest laid not in the plot, but rather in how he could use the camera to tell the story. This was not always easy considering he fired his original camera man due to a contract dispute. This new camera man, Jack Cox, was so liked by Hitchcock that he would be the cameraman on Hitch's next nine films.

The camera work rather than showing off, adds layers of depth to the film. It gives you an insight to how the characters perceive what is happening in the story. This is particularly true in a fantastic scene at a party, when Jack becomes jealous of Bob's relationship with his wife. This is all shown visually through the camera, and it tells what is happening better than any intertitle could.

The Ring while not a box office success was a huge critical success. Some critics even referred to it as the greatest British film ever made.

The Ring is a delightful film, and should be much better remembered. There is no doubt after you watch this film that Hitchcock is not only a the master of suspense, but also a great filmmaker no matter what type of film he was making, and one of the greatest directors who ever lived.

-Michael J. Ruhland


Recourses Used
http://www.silentfilm.org/archive/the-ring
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/449788/The-Ring/articles.html
Hitchcock's British Films by Maurice Yacowar